Don't cite the Declaration of Independence about your shot selection. Three-point shots are great (or terrible) shots depending on situation and skill.
All shooters are not created equal.
All shot situations are not the same. NBA fans will debate the merit of LeBron James' decision to pass to Danny Green for a potential game-winning three.
I thought it was a good decision considering LeBron's angle of attack, the degree of "contestedness," and Green's proficiency. Here's Danny Green's 2019-2020 shot chart. FWIW, Green's three-point percentage from the top of the arc was 21.4% on a small sample size.
And all three point shots are not alike. Some examples include:
1) Catch-and-shoot threes
2) Off the dribble threes (lower percentage than off the catch)
3) Pump fake threes (my gestalt is that it's much lower, but replaced by SDT)
4) Side-dribble/one dribble threes (SDT)
5) Coming off downscreen catch-and-pivot threes
6) Below and above the break threes
The one-dribble three is becoming a weapon.
The "side-dribble three" has become a force unto itself.
Of course, Steph Curry doesn't play for us.
The corner three is fundamentally different than the above-the-break three with a higher point per possession rating. "Teams have realized that they can improve their offense by simply changing their shot selection. Take more threes and score more points...In addition, spacing the floor with 3-point threats provides space for players to drive, cut, roll, and post-up."
Lagniappe: Empty the lane for a back cut using screens
Thad Matta's Ohio State used this against us on a foreign tour to Windsor. They ran this cut out and decision-making read to a skip, curl or flex cut. It was hard to guard because of the decision-making. pic.twitter.com/6eDl419dNT
— Chris Oliver (@BBallImmersion) December 23, 2020
Lagniappe 2: Chris Webber on rookies, "You have to show your value by doing the little things."
Lagniappe 3: The end of the Celtics game.