As a coach, my philosophy is "share something great." For example:
- Books
- Philosophy
- Quotes
- Learning Strategies
- How not to repeat painful losses
Basketball education, fundamentals, opinion, video and more
As a coach, my philosophy is "share something great." For example:
"Pressure is playing a five dollar Nassau with two dollars in your pocket." - Golfer Lee Trevino
Everyone experiences pressure in their lives. Some cultivate the tools to manage it as well as possible. Pressure degrades performance.
Pressure forms in perception. Some people see pressure as opportunity and others see it as crisis.
Allistair McCaw described Olympic diver Greg Louganis' approach in Habits That Make a Champion. “When you walk into that arena, there’s an energy, it is palpable. If you interpret that energy as pressure, you’re more apt to implode. But if you interpret that pressure as energy and inspiration, it can catapult you to levels you never dreamed possible.”"
Under pressure, we fall to the level of our training. Navy SEALs have "Hell Week" with severe physical challenges, sleep and calorie deprivation while trainers harass them, daring them to quit. "Ring the bell."
Managing Pressure
Practice with constraints and using situational basketball.
Why run the stuff you're running? It's worth a deep dive this offseason. https://t.co/xDyj9jt5yl
— WINK (@tristan_wink) June 18, 2026
"In life and in sports, I have always believed that one of the most important decisions you can make is: Choosing your surroundings in terms of people and environment." - "Habits That Make A Champion" by Allistair McCaw
Our environments shape us. In Freakonomics, readers learned that one of the prime educational factors was the number of books in the home. Exposure to books impacts childhood learning.
Our training environment matters...the culture and the people who surround us.
LeBron James invests over a million dollars annually in his training environment - nutrition, sleep, mindfulness, basketball.
Just finished up my college baseball career last month, so I figured I would share some advice I wish I knew before I started my college career. These are based on my opinions and experiences, so if you disagree with some of these feel free to share your opinion. pic.twitter.com/UwWaxypSz0
— Riley Bender (@RileyBender7) June 15, 2026
Sport is a meritocracy. Career arcs generally follow production. As a D1 walk-on pitcher, I had about the undistinguished career that you would expect. As a Harvard freshman (not eligible then), I pitched batting practice to a team that went to Omaha. So there's that.
1. There are studs at every level.
Show up prepared physically and mentally every day. Don't blame coaches for our limitations.
2. Mental game importance
Attitude leads choices and effort. Even though we're not "in the game," be aware of the game flow, strategy, and personnel.
3. Mental game tips
Focus is trainable. Habit formation defines destiny. Mindfulness is a force multiplier.
4. Know your why.
Our why can change. Priorities (e.g. graduate school, earning spending money) can replace previous priorities.
5. Know your reasons for choosing a school.
Find a good fit. If sport is a primary driver and you don't have the same commitment to the school, then poor production, coaching changes, academic woes, or many other issues can derail the process and necessitate transfer.
6. Competition and relationships.
Coaching is a relationship business. Day-to-day competition can impact relationships. In some instances in sport, people sabotage others to advance their cause. Carl Pierson's "The Politics of Coaching" shares a valuable resource and is a worthy read for every coach and sports parent.
7. Nothing is promised.
Experience shows that expectations and reality often do not intersect. Life reflects the differences between what happens and our response.
8. Anything can happen.
Some people fashion incredible success stories from humble origins and others "flame out" despite having every advantage.
9. You get out what you put in.
The Greeks described three values - ethos (moral character and credibility), logos (reason/logic), and pathos (emotion). Hard work isn't a guarantee, but not working hard guarantees less. Ultimately character and competence separate most outcomes.
Lagniappe. Coach Berge coaching phrases.
What are your favorite coaching phrases?
— Greg Berge (@GregBerge) June 17, 2026
Here are 20 of the best.
1. "Iron sharpens Iron."
2. "Are you a fountain or a drain?"
3. "Trust the process."
4. "Be a champion by choice."
5. "Eliminate easy. Handle hard."
6. “Find an excuse or find a way.”
7. "Never give up."…
Two of my favorites are, "Everyone can't be a great player but everyone can choose to be a great teammate" and "sacrifice."
Lagniappe 2. Coaches want everyone to succeed.
If you watched your
— Tom Crean (@TomCrean) June 17, 2026
1. Missed shots
2. Turnovers
3. Amount of standing watching the Ball
4. 1st 2 steps to the offensive glass, running the floor and in recovery defensively
5. How quick you get back on D after a turnover, missed shot or non call.
You’d get better QUICKLY
NBA Finals MVP Jalen Brunson said the one constant among winning players is being willing to fail in the summer when nobody is watching.
— Bryce Butler (@bball_brainiac1) June 17, 2026
Every failed rep forces you to adjust and figure it out, and that is exactly what builds the self belief that shows up when the lights come… pic.twitter.com/YngmlvRdXO
Have the will to fail.
Unconventional wisdom allows the neonate to walk, the pitcher to pitch to contact, the point guard to find new ways to score and lead.
The story that resonates shares the mogul skier watched by a nine year-old who says, "I love how you ski. You never fall." At that moment, the woman realized she could not become a champion without taking more risk, having the will to fail. She became a champion.
There's a saying that the cost of an Olympic Gold Medal in figure skating is falling 20,000 times.
The conventional advice is "leave your comfort zone."
Leaving the Comfort Zone
Growth seldom happens inside our comfort zone. Improvement requires a willingness to be uncomfortable, make mistakes, and risk failure in pursuit of mastery.
One of the fastest ways to improve is to compete against superior athletes - bigger, faster, stronger, more skilled.
Leveling up can be humbling. What worked before may not still work. Your favorite moves may be shut down. Weaknesses are exposed that were hidden against lesser opponents.
Many women's college programs have a scrimmage team comprised of men.
Better competition informs gaps in your game and forces change. Great players seek strong opponents. "Iron sharpens iron."
Most athletes enjoy practicing known skills. The problem is that comfort does not foster growth.
The forward who struggles to contain the ball needs to grow grit and skill through playing one-on-one. The shooting guard who avoids penetration should work on athleticism, footwork, and reading defenders. The center who struggles on the defensive boards needs both strength and technique.
The will to attack weaknesses separates good players from exceptional ones.
Leadership can create stress, especially for athletes who are natural introverts. You don't need a title to lead.
Leadership means communicating early, loud, and often. Hold teammates accountable, encourage others through mistakes, and raise standards when hard times come...and they always do.
Leadership can improve performance though commitment to excellence and growing confidence. Teaching, communicating, and setting an example deepen understanding and strengthen commitment to the team.
In each case, the athlete chooses challenge over comfort:
The comfort zone feels safe, but growth lives elsewhere.
The athletes who consistently stretch themselves - physically, mentally, and emotionally - can approach mastery. Have the will to fail.
Lagniappe. Love our losses.
For good reason, humans are "wired" to believe what we see and hear. On the savanna, a noise in the bush could represent an "imminent threat." Failure to respond could be a matter of life and death in a "target rich environment" for predators (snakes, lions, etc.).
As coaches and student-athletes, we usually don't have the same urgency. Take the time to review new information and see whether it belongs in our 'software'.
Sport tends toward "copycat" approaches. That can apply to anything:
10 Traits of A Coachable Athlete:
Do they understand “who you are” or are they only thinking about “what you are?”
Kobe Bryant kept it simple, “Prove them wrong” with your work.
Cinema celebrates individuals and teams that overcame underdog status.
We often train defense like every other basketball skill. That's a mistake.
— Mike Jagacki (@Mike_Jagacki) June 12, 2026
Defensive development requires a different framework than shooting, ball handling, or finishing. https://t.co/Uqtl1honda
Overlapping values between players and coaches creates synergy.Kirby Smart shares the two things he looks for in everyone who joins Georgia.
— Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness (@coachajkings) June 12, 2026
"The threat for us is complacency. The first thing you have to do is acknowledge that it's a threat. If you acknowledge it - that's the first step towards stomping it out."
Then he revealed what… pic.twitter.com/zipuFLPEh3
Almost every player is concerned with:
View on Threads
Good teams have systems to create advantage to get Newell’s “more and better shots than opponents.”
Adopt a systematic approach to analyze and diagnose the current state of your team.
What are your players' strengths and weaknesses? Extend the Dr. Fergus Connolly model from "Game Changer."
Where is your offensive advantage?
Where is your defensive advantage (or limitation)?
What are your preferred systems?
What can you teach?
Each coach has teaching strengths and all players don't have the same basketball aptitude.
How much time do you want to invest in teaching systems versus player development that could translate to any offense?
Miscellaneous
When training young players, spend less time obsessing over skill development and more time building habits.
— Steve Dagostino (@DagsBasketball) June 9, 2026
Skills matter.
But discipline, effort, focus, accountability, resilience, and consistency are what allow those skills to develop over time.
The best youth coaches… pic.twitter.com/gdQFASMLHP
Sport is not warfare, but coaches can generate edges using its principles. Asymmetrical warfare is fundamentally about refusing to fight the opponent's battle on their terms.
The strong side wants symmetry. The weaker side wants asymmetry. The American Revolution was an example of an insurgency with asymmetrical warfare tactics.
One military example cited is the Millennium Challenge 2002 war game, where retired Marine Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper used motorcycles, couriers, deception, and unconventional tactics against a technologically superior force. Instead of playing the game as designed, he changed the game.
Basketball coaches have exerted the same pressure for decades.
The classic example. Wooden said, "Basketball is a game meant to be played fast." That made sense for his superior talent. If the opponent is bigger, deeper, and more athletic, reducing possessions shrinks the talent advantage.
A 70-possession game becomes a 45-possession game.
Gene Hackman's fictional Coach Norman Dale (Hoosiers) understood this in Hoosiers. So did countless small-school coaches before the shot clock era.
Variance of performance (with fewer possessions) becomes your friend.
Think of Nolan Richardson and "40 Minutes of Hell."
A less talented team often cannot survive a half-court talent contest. So they create chaos. The press transforms a game from execution, skill, and size into fatigue, decisions, and turnovers.
Change the battlefield.
Teams cannot prepare for everything. In the early 1970s, we used multiple defenses, variably extended (e.g. full court, half-court) including run-and-jump, box-and-one, and others.
If the opponent has one dominant player and four role players, why play conventional defense? The famous example is the box-and-one used by the Toronto Raptors against Stephen Curry in the 2019 Finals.
The defense says: "This may look ugly but it works."
Most coaches play slower when teams are undermanned. Sometimes the opposite works. Loyola Marymount Lions under Paul Westhead turned every game into a track meet. Grinnell played "System basketball."
When both teams normally score 70, talent wins. If both teams score 110, strange things happen. Pace weaponizes chaos.
"Hack-a-Shaq." Purists hate it, yet strategists understand it. The weaker side identifies a weakness and repeatedly attacks it.
Military planners target a vulnerability and basketball coaches call it intentional fouling.
If you have lemons, make lemonade. Instead of matching the opponent's 6'8" post player, spread the floor with shooters.
Force their strength to become a weakness. An opponent's center may become unplayable. ansymmetry doesn't attack strength, it adapts.
Man-to-man often exposes athletic gaps. Zones camouflage weaknesses such as problems containing the dribbler. The zone asks, "Can you consistently make perimeter shots?"
Many superior teams don't have strong shooting. The underdog switches individual matchups for collective positioning.
When you cannot recruit (or buy) elite athletes, recruit intelligence. Princeton's Pete Carril elevated this to an art form.
The offense advantaged:
Stronger teams became frustrated because it meant defending unfamiliar principles.
A conventional defense guards conventionally. Asymmetrical defense focuses on the biggest threats, "Who can beat us?" Then it overloads those players.
The strategy concedes some outcomes seeking to contain others. Military commanders call this concentrating force at decisive points.
For years, underdogs recognized something before the basketball establishment did - three is worth more than two. UMBC took down Virginia in a 1-16 NCAA tournament matchup by leveraging the perimeter. UMBC shot 12-24 from three versus 4-22 for UVA.
The underdog could lose most possessions but still win the scoreboard. What looked reckless was mathematics.
Modern offenses relentlessly seek one defender - the weakest defender. "Switch everything" defenses allow offenses to create the matchups against players like James Harden.
This is asymmetrical warfare distilled to its essence - find the weak point and repeat it again and again.
Some teams are physically superior but can be frustrated by different paces or tactics. These include:
The objective is not merely tactical but leverages cognitive overload.
Military strategist John Boyd would call this getting inside the opponent's OODA loop - observe, orient, decide, and act.
The biggest lesson from asymmetrical warfare may be this: The weaker side loses when it confronts the stronger side on a 'level playing field'.
The underdog's first question should not be,"How do we stop them?" Instead, "How do we make this a different game?"
Van Riper accomplished this in Millennium Challenge. Drone and autonomous weaponry achieves this today. That is what every successful underdog has done since David wielded a sling instead of a sword.
Fight 'unfairly'. Create the game they didn't prepare for.
Lagniappe. Teach adaptability.
Pete Carroll on Coaching 🎥
— Greg Berge (@GregBerge) June 7, 2026
Great coaches don’t just demand compliance. They teach athletes to think, adapt, and figure it out.
Coaching = Belief in someone’s potential + Commitment to their journey. pic.twitter.com/xtV12OeNME
Whom do you want to become? Are you going to get by on talent or do you understand your 'need areas' and have a plan to become your best? Everyone wants to be better. Not everyone has the will to push themselves. One of the biggest challenges for young athletes is developing a "whatever it takes" attitude.
Attention to detail, commitment, and discipline to follow through define excellence. Set an example. Leadership is action, not a title.
Figure out your process:
1) Playing basketball (most of you play offseason) - skill and strategic development
2) Functional strength training - training involves conditioning (increasing your maximal oxygen consumption), strength (incorporating weights), and balance
3) Mental skills (resilience training)
How Good Do You Want to Be? by Nick Saban is one of the most practical leadership-and-performance manuals written by a coach. Here are five core concepts that stand out in the book, each explained clearly and with coaching implications:
Saban’s defining philosophy:
Focus on what you must do each moment, not on the result you hope for.
He argues that players and teams fail when they obsess over winning instead of the steps that produce winning — technique, conditioning, habits, discipline, preparation. The Process is about doing ordinary things with extraordinary consistency.
Coaching takeaway:
Win the next rep, the next contact, the next play. Championships come later.
Saban frames discipline not as punishment, but as doing what you’re supposed to do even when you don't feel like it.
Everyone wants success — few are willing to live the habits success requires. Discipline builds identity. Identity drives outcomes.
Coaching takeaway:
Consistent behavior > occasional brilliance. Standards > mood.
Saban is relentlessly detailed — foot placement, alignment, stance, film notes, recovery, communication. He believes most people fail not from lack of talent, but from ignoring small things that compound into big failures.
Coaching takeaway:
Little things are not little. They are the game. Train them.
Saban teaches that teams rise when individuals take responsibility for one another — not just for themselves. Leaders speak up, hold peers accountable, elevate the standard, and model the behavior they expect.
Coaching takeaway:
A team cannot be coach-driven only. It must be player-led.
He warns against distractions — media hype, social influence, comparisons, entitlement, pressure. A team must control its internal environment, protect its culture, and anchor identity to core values rather than results or reputation.
Coaching takeaway:
Silence the noise. Stay aligned with purpose, not praise.
Coaches often get better not by finding better answers, but by asking better questions.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) can help our self-reflection. AI can be conversational, critical, or complementary. It often gives us what we ask for. The quality of the answers depends on the quality of the questions. Here are some "W's."
Where's the added value?
What's new, different, and possible?
Everyone has blind spots. What are ours?
Where am I mistaken, ill-informed, or just wrong?
What should we worry about? Are there pitfalls or obstacles that we haven't seen?
Wisdom
What truths endure?
That final "W" counterbalances "Wonder." Wonder searches for what is new; Wisdom preserves the timeless.
Example: Coach Ellis Lane drilled "the ball is gold" into us. Turnovers kill dreams. Taking care of the basketball is a skill.
Lagniappe. Investment guru Howard Marks marveled that AI could have a sense of humor. When he asked Claude.ai for 'critical' feedback, it started by asking "critical or hypocritical."
Mike Neighbors shares critical wisdom.
Want to learn how to dominate the court with a lightning-fast offense? Watch Coach Mike Neighbors break down his revolutionary "Functionally Fast" transition offense.
— Coach Tony Miller (@tonywmiller) June 8, 2026
0:00 What it means to play Functionally Fast
0:52 Player Positions for Functionally Fast
1:30 Position: Locks… pic.twitter.com/NRUlwFYctg