Total Pageviews

Thursday, September 10, 2026

Basketball - The "To" or "For" Proposition

What's your impact? 

Extract information from multiple sources as possible. I've shared Michael Useem's questions from "The Leadership Moment." 

What went well? Preserve it.
What went poorly? Diagnose it.
What can we do better? Change it.
What are the enduring lessons? Teach them. 

Continual evaluation (we don't see everything) helps us to recalibrate our assessment

Brett Ledbetter (What Drives Winning?) stratifies value:

Person > Player > Performance

This points at "To" and "For" evaluation:

What is a player doing to the team? (It's more than numbers.)

What is a player doing for the team? 

Coaches, teammates, families, and outsiders all have different perspective, much like the Kurosawa classic, "Rashomon." 


Four versions of the truth emerge. Which explains what happened? 

Finding Answers

  • Time - players evolve
  • Volume of data - sample size
  • Objective measures - "rationality"
  • Avoiding confirmation bias - "everyone says so"
  • Avoid emotional hijacking - "liking influences judgment"
Confounding variables
  • Previous data 
  • Changing conditions 
  • Internal differences of opinion

As players and coaches, find positive ways to align "to" and "for." 

Lagniappe. Maintain an attack mentality on both ends of the floor. 

View on Threads