Total Pageviews

Monday, October 27, 2025

Basketball - The Confidence Game

"Confidence comes from proven success." - Bill Parcells

High performance requires high sustained confidence. In every domain, crises arise, and our response impacts results.

Coaching imparts a degree of "know that." Playing experience teaches us "know how." 

Every coaches experiences moments where a player makes a mistake and then looks to the bench and says, "I know, I know." Does the coach say nothing, brooding silently, reply "then do it," or respond, "focus and make the next play." 

Success demands balance. Confidence balances arrogance and doubt. Coaching can raise, maintain, or shatter confidence. Performance blends decision-making and execution. In baseball hitting, outcomes link to timing and "getting your pitch." Conversely, the pitcher succeeds, by working fast, throwing strikes, and changing speeds - disrupting timing. 


Ted Williams's chart illustrates. Former Red Sox pitcher Gary Peters explained his struggles, "I was wild in the strike zone." 

The same issues arise in basketball. 

  • Shot selection. ROB shots - in range, open, balanced.
  • Defensive contestedness. Open shots are better shots.
  • Communication. Communication energizes and intimidates.
  • Risk taking. Gambling defenses expose opportunities. 
  • Effort is a choice. Low effort defense increases opponent confidence.
How can coaches build confidence? 
  • Speak greatness. "That was good AND" is better than "that was good BUT...
  • Catch players in the act of doing something right.
  • Use video to reinforce positive actions. 
  • Expand playing time according to better play. 
  • Share praise via team leaders, assistants, and the media.
  • Clarify expectations and standards; praise meeting both. 
Confidence building doesn't exclude correction. Coach Shawanda Brown reminded players who took a bad shot or didn't pass to the open teammate, "That is not how we play." 

  "Water the flowers and pull the weeds." 

Lagniappe. The great teammate... 

Lagniappe 2. AI input from Peter Atwater's "The Confidence Map"

1. Confidence is contextual, not constant.

Atwater argues that confidence isn’t a trait we “have” but a state we move through.

  • It’s situational — shaped by control (our sense of agency) and clarity (how predictable our environment feels).

  • A person may feel supremely confident as a coach in practice (high control, high clarity) yet uneasy as an investor during market volatility (low control, low clarity).

  • Confidence rises when we can anticipate outcomes and influence them; it collapses when we feel powerless and confused.
    Lesson: build systems that expand clarity and reinforce agency — structure, communication, routines — so confidence can regenerate.

2. The Confidence Map: control × clarity

Atwater maps confidence on two axes:

  • Control (high ↔ low)

  • Clarity (high ↔ low)

This yields four quadrants:

QuadrantControlClarityEmotional StateBehavior Tendency
The Comfort ZoneHighHighConfident, calmTake thoughtful risks, collaborate
The Launch ZoneHighLowCurious, optimisticExperiment, innovate, “ready–fire–aim”
The Stress ZoneLowHighFearful, risk-averseOvercontrol, micromanage
The Crisis ZoneLowLowPanicked, paralyzedFreeze, blame, retreat

We constantly move among these quadrants. Leaders’ job: help people back toward comfort or launch, away from stress or crisis.

3. Confidence drives collective behavior — and markets.

Atwater, a behavioral economist by training, links confidence cycles to herd behavior and asset prices:

  • When collective confidence is high, people extrapolate good times forever (bubbles, over-optimism).

  • When confidence collapses, even strong fundamentals can’t overcome fear (crashes, retrenchment).

  • Market sentiment, consumer spending, and political tone all follow the same psychological tides.
    Application: As a coach or investor, watch the emotional climate, not just the metrics. Momentum, morale, and valuation all mirror confidence swings.

4. Storytelling restores clarity.

When confidence breaks down, information alone rarely repairs it. What rebuilds clarity is narrative coherence — a believable story explaining what happened and what’s next.

  • During uncertainty, people crave meaning as much as control.

  • Leaders who articulate a simple, truthful story (“Here’s where we are, why it matters, and how we’ll move forward”) re-anchor groups.
    Coaching parallel: after a tough loss, athletes regain footing through a shared story — “We learned who we are under pressure” — not through a stat sheet.

5. Confidence begets generosity; fear breeds self-interest.

Atwater closes with a moral and social insight:

  • In high-confidence states, people tend to collaborate, share credit, and take long-term views.

  • In low-confidence states, they hoard, blame, and focus narrowly on survival.
    This applies from teams to societies. Confidence expands the circle of “we.”
    Lesson: building team confidence isn’t just psychological hygiene — it’s the foundation of unselfish play, trust, and long-term resilience.

In short

Atwater’s map isn’t about ego; it’s about navigation. Confidence isn’t arrogance — it’s the alignment of clarity and control. Leaders who restore those two variables don’t just calm the storm; they change its direction.